<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<id>https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/feeds/paul-krugman.xml</id>
<title>Paul Krugman: resolved predictions</title>
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/feeds/paul-krugman.xml"/>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/paul-krugman"/>
<updated>2022-07-21T00:00:00Z</updated>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2022-07-21:paul-krugman/2021-inflation-transitory</id>
<title>Paul Krugman: wrong on &quot;The 2021 rise in inflation will be transitory&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/paul-krugman#p-2021-inflation-transitory"/>
<updated>2022-07-21T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. The 2021 rise in inflation will be transitory. Made 2021, resolved 21 Jul 2022. US inflation peaked at 9.1% in June 2022. Krugman published a column titled &quot;I was wrong about inflation&quot;. Effect on Paul Krugman&#39;s credibility: 45% → 35% (−9.8 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2016-11-15:paul-krugman/2016-markets-never</id>
<title>Paul Krugman: wrong on &quot;After Trump&#39;s election, markets will never recover and a global recession is likely&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/paul-krugman#p-2016-markets-never"/>
<updated>2016-11-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. After Trump&#39;s election, markets will never recover and a global recession is likely. Made 9 Nov 2016, resolved Nov 2016. US stock indices reached record highs within weeks. Krugman retracted the call three days later. Effect on Paul Krugman&#39;s credibility: 57% → 44% (−13.0 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2015-12-15:paul-krugman/2009-deficits-rates</id>
<title>Paul Krugman: right on &quot;Large US budget deficits will not drive interest rates up while the economy stays depressed&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/paul-krugman#p-2009-deficits-rates"/>
<updated>2015-12-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. Large US budget deficits will not drive interest rates up while the economy stays depressed. Made 2009, resolved Dec 2015. The 10-year Treasury yield averaged under 3% in every year from 2011 to 2015. Effect on Paul Krugman&#39;s credibility: 40% → 57% (+17.1 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2005-07-01:paul-krugman/1998-internet-fax</id>
<title>Paul Krugman: wrong on &quot;By 2005 or so it will be clear that the internet&#39;s impact on the economy has been no greater than the fax machine&#39;s&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/paul-krugman#p-1998-internet-fax"/>
<updated>2005-07-01T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. By 2005 or so it will be clear that the internet&#39;s impact on the economy has been no greater than the fax machine&#39;s. Made Jun 1998, resolved 2005. Effect on Paul Krugman&#39;s credibility: 50% → 33% (−16.7 pts).</summary>
</entry>
</feed>
