<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<id>https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/feed.xml</id>
<title>Prediction Track Record: resolved predictions</title>
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/feed.xml"/>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/"/>
<updated>2025-12-31T00:00:00Z</updated>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2025-12-31:elon-musk/2025-robotaxi-half-us</id>
<title>Elon Musk: wrong on &quot;Tesla&#39;s robotaxi service will cover half the US population by the end of 2025&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/elon-musk#p-2025-robotaxi-half-us"/>
<updated>2025-12-31T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. Tesla&#39;s robotaxi service will cover half the US population by the end of 2025. Made 23 Jul 2025, resolved 31 Dec 2025. At the end of 2025 the service ran in Austin and the San Francisco Bay Area only. Effect on Elon Musk&#39;s credibility: 29% → 25% (−4.6 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2024-11-30:csu-hurricane-forecast/2024-season</id>
<title>CSU hurricane forecast team: right on &quot;The 2024 Atlantic season will be extremely active: 23 named storms, 11 hurricanes, 5 major (April outlook)&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/csu-hurricane-forecast#p-2024-season"/>
<updated>2024-11-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. The 2024 Atlantic season will be extremely active: 23 named storms, 11 hurricanes, 5 major (April outlook). Made 4 Apr 2024, resolved 30 Nov 2024. 2024 had 18 named storms, 11 hurricanes and 5 major hurricanes. Effect on CSU hurricane forecast team&#39;s credibility: 58% → 67% (+9.3 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2024-11-05:allan-lichtman/2024-president</id>
<title>Allan Lichtman: wrong on &quot;Kamala Harris wins the 2024 presidential election&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/allan-lichtman#p-2024-president"/>
<updated>2024-11-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. Kamala Harris wins the 2024 presidential election. Made 5 Sep 2024, resolved 5 Nov 2024. Lichtman said afterwards he was taking time to assess why he was wrong. Effect on Allan Lichtman&#39;s credibility: 72% → 60% (−12.1 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2024-11-05:ann-selzer/2024-iowa-president</id>
<title>Ann Selzer: wrong on &quot;Kamala Harris carries Iowa in 2024 (final Iowa Poll: Harris +3)&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/ann-selzer#p-2024-iowa-president"/>
<updated>2024-11-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. Kamala Harris carries Iowa in 2024 (final Iowa Poll: Harris +3). Made 2 Nov 2024, resolved 5 Nov 2024. Trump won Iowa by 13.2 points. Selzer retired from election polling later that month. Effect on Ann Selzer&#39;s credibility: 76% → 61% (−14.8 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2024-11-05:nate-silver/2024-president</id>
<title>Nate Silver: wrong on &quot;Kamala Harris wins the 2024 presidential election&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/nate-silver#p-2024-president"/>
<updated>2024-11-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. Kamala Harris wins the 2024 presidential election. Made 5 Nov 2024, resolved 5 Nov 2024. Silver Bulletin&#39;s final model had Harris winning 40,012 of 80,000 simulations, effectively a coin flip. Effect on Nate Silver&#39;s credibility: 55% → 54% (−0.9 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2024-10-10:larry-summers/2022-unemployment-5pct</id>
<title>Larry Summers: wrong on &quot;Containing inflation will take five years of unemployment above 5%, or a shorter spell at a higher rate&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/larry-summers#p-2022-unemployment-5pct"/>
<updated>2024-10-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. Containing inflation will take five years of unemployment above 5%, or a shorter spell at a higher rate. Made Jun 2022, resolved 10 Oct 2024. Inflation fell to 2.4% by September 2024 while unemployment stayed at or below 4.3%. Effect on Larry Summers&#39;s credibility: 72% → 56% (−15.7 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2023-12-31:nouriel-roubini/2022-long-ugly-recession</id>
<title>Nouriel Roubini: wrong on &quot;The US will fall into a severe, long and ugly recession starting late 2022 and lasting through 2023&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/nouriel-roubini#p-2022-long-ugly-recession"/>
<updated>2023-12-31T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. The US will fall into a severe, long and ugly recession starting late 2022 and lasting through 2023. Made 19 Sep 2022, resolved 31 Dec 2023. The US economy grew in 2023 and no recession was declared. Effect on Nouriel Roubini&#39;s credibility: 56% → 42% (−13.5 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2023-03-10:jim-cramer/2023-svb</id>
<title>Jim Cramer: wrong on &quot;SVB Financial is a buy and one of the biggest winners of 2023 so far&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/jim-cramer#p-2023-svb"/>
<updated>2023-03-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. SVB Financial is a buy and one of the biggest winners of 2023 so far. Made 8 Feb 2023, resolved 10 Mar 2023. Regulators closed Silicon Valley Bank on 10 March 2023. Effect on Jim Cramer&#39;s credibility: 39% → 28% (−10.9 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2022-12-31:elon-musk/2017-mars-cargo-2022</id>
<title>Elon Musk: wrong on &quot;SpaceX will land cargo ships on Mars in 2022&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/elon-musk#p-2017-mars-cargo-2022"/>
<updated>2022-12-31T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. SpaceX will land cargo ships on Mars in 2022. Made 29 Sep 2017, resolved 31 Dec 2022. Effect on Elon Musk&#39;s credibility: 33% → 28% (−5.4 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2022-07-21:paul-krugman/2021-inflation-transitory</id>
<title>Paul Krugman: wrong on &quot;The 2021 rise in inflation will be transitory&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/paul-krugman#p-2021-inflation-transitory"/>
<updated>2022-07-21T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. The 2021 rise in inflation will be transitory. Made 2021, resolved 21 Jul 2022. US inflation peaked at 9.1% in June 2022. Krugman published a column titled &quot;I was wrong about inflation&quot;. Effect on Paul Krugman&#39;s credibility: 45% → 35% (−9.8 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2022-07-13:larry-summers/2021-stimulus-inflation</id>
<title>Larry Summers: right on &quot;The 2021 American Rescue Plan risks setting off inflation of a kind not seen in a generation&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/larry-summers#p-2021-stimulus-inflation"/>
<updated>2022-07-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. The 2021 American Rescue Plan risks setting off inflation of a kind not seen in a generation. Made 4 Feb 2021, resolved 13 Jul 2022. US consumer price inflation reached 9.1% for June 2022, the highest since 1981. Effect on Larry Summers&#39;s credibility: 65% → 74% (+9.2 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2020-12-31:elon-musk/2019-million-robotaxis</id>
<title>Elon Musk: wrong on &quot;Tesla will have over a million robotaxis on the road in 2020&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/elon-musk#p-2019-million-robotaxis"/>
<updated>2020-12-31T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. Tesla will have over a million robotaxis on the road in 2020. Made 22 Apr 2019, resolved 31 Dec 2020. Effect on Elon Musk&#39;s credibility: 39% → 32% (−7.1 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2020-11-30:csu-hurricane-forecast/2020-season</id>
<title>CSU hurricane forecast team: right on &quot;The 2020 Atlantic season will be more active than average: 16 named storms, 8 hurricanes (April outlook)&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/csu-hurricane-forecast#p-2020-season"/>
<updated>2020-11-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. The 2020 Atlantic season will be more active than average: 16 named storms, 8 hurricanes (April outlook). Made 2 Apr 2020, resolved 30 Nov 2020. 2020 set a record with 30 named storms, so the direction was right and the counts far too low. Effect on CSU hurricane forecast team&#39;s credibility: 46% → 59% (+13.7 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2020-11-03:allan-lichtman/2020-president</id>
<title>Allan Lichtman: right on &quot;Joe Biden wins the 2020 presidential election&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/allan-lichtman#p-2020-president"/>
<updated>2020-11-03T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. Joe Biden wins the 2020 presidential election. Made 5 Aug 2020, resolved 3 Nov 2020. Effect on Allan Lichtman&#39;s credibility: 69% → 74% (+5.3 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2020-11-03:ann-selzer/2020-iowa-president</id>
<title>Ann Selzer: right on &quot;Donald Trump carries Iowa in 2020 (final Iowa Poll: Trump +7)&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/ann-selzer#p-2020-iowa-president"/>
<updated>2020-11-03T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. Donald Trump carries Iowa in 2020 (final Iowa Poll: Trump +7). Made 31 Oct 2020, resolved 3 Nov 2020. Trump won Iowa by 8.2 points, while most other polls showed a close race. Effect on Ann Selzer&#39;s credibility: 74% → 79% (+5.4 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2020-11-03:nate-silver/2020-president</id>
<title>Nate Silver: right on &quot;Joe Biden wins the 2020 presidential election&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/nate-silver#p-2020-president"/>
<updated>2020-11-03T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. Joe Biden wins the 2020 presidential election. Made 3 Nov 2020, resolved 3 Nov 2020. Final FiveThirtyEight forecast: Biden favoured in 89 of 100 simulations. Effect on Nate Silver&#39;s credibility: 49% → 56% (+7.3 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2020-11-03:sam-wang/2020-president</id>
<title>Sam Wang: right on &quot;Joe Biden wins the 2020 presidential election&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/sam-wang#p-2020-president"/>
<updated>2020-11-03T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. Joe Biden wins the 2020 presidential election. Made Nov 2020, resolved 3 Nov 2020. Effect on Sam Wang&#39;s credibility: 49% → 59% (+10.0 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2020-06-08:nouriel-roubini/2018-recession-2020</id>
<title>Nouriel Roubini: partly on &quot;The conditions are in place for a recession and financial crisis in 2020&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/nouriel-roubini#p-2018-recession-2020"/>
<updated>2020-06-08T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Partly. The conditions are in place for a recession and financial crisis in 2020. Made 13 Sep 2018, resolved 8 Jun 2020. A US recession did begin in 2020, but it was caused by the pandemic rather than the factors the article listed. Effect on Nouriel Roubini&#39;s credibility: 59% → 57% (−2.7 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2020-04-30:elon-musk/2020-covid-zero</id>
<title>Elon Musk: wrong on &quot;The US will probably have close to zero new COVID-19 cases by the end of April 2020&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/elon-musk#p-2020-covid-zero"/>
<updated>2020-04-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. The US will probably have close to zero new COVID-19 cases by the end of April 2020. Made 19 Mar 2020, resolved 30 Apr 2020. The US was recording tens of thousands of new cases a day at the end of April 2020. Effect on Elon Musk&#39;s credibility: 50% → 39% (−10.6 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2019-12-15:larry-summers/2013-secular-stagnation</id>
<title>Larry Summers: right on &quot;The US faces secular stagnation: weak demand will keep interest rates low for years&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/larry-summers#p-2013-secular-stagnation"/>
<updated>2019-12-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. The US faces secular stagnation: weak demand will keep interest rates low for years. Made Nov 2013, resolved Dec 2019. The Federal Reserve&#39;s policy rate stayed at or below 2.5% from 2008 through 2019. Effect on Larry Summers&#39;s credibility: 50% → 67% (+16.7 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2017-12-31:elon-musk/2016-coast-to-coast</id>
<title>Elon Musk: wrong on &quot;A Tesla will drive itself from Los Angeles to New York with no one touching the controls by the end of 2017&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/elon-musk#p-2016-coast-to-coast"/>
<updated>2017-12-31T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. A Tesla will drive itself from Los Angeles to New York with no one touching the controls by the end of 2017. Made 19 Oct 2016, resolved 31 Dec 2017. Effect on Elon Musk&#39;s credibility: 66% → 50% (−16.7 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2017-10-15:steve-ballmer/2007-iphone-share</id>
<title>Steve Ballmer: wrong on &quot;There is no chance the iPhone will get any significant market share&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/steve-ballmer#p-2007-iphone-share"/>
<updated>2017-10-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. There is no chance the iPhone will get any significant market share. Made 30 Apr 2007, resolved Oct 2017. The iPhone became one of the two dominant smartphone platforms; Microsoft stopped developing Windows Phone in 2017. Effect on Steve Ballmer&#39;s credibility: 50% → 33% (−16.7 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2017-07-28:elon-musk/2016-model-3-2017</id>
<title>Elon Musk: right on &quot;Tesla Model 3 deliveries will begin in late 2017&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/elon-musk#p-2016-model-3-2017"/>
<updated>2017-07-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. Tesla Model 3 deliveries will begin in late 2017. Made 31 Mar 2016, resolved 28 Jul 2017. The first 30 cars were handed over on 28 July 2017; volume production took much longer. Effect on Elon Musk&#39;s credibility: 50% → 67% (+16.7 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2016-11-15:paul-krugman/2016-markets-never</id>
<title>Paul Krugman: wrong on &quot;After Trump&#39;s election, markets will never recover and a global recession is likely&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/paul-krugman#p-2016-markets-never"/>
<updated>2016-11-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. After Trump&#39;s election, markets will never recover and a global recession is likely. Made 9 Nov 2016, resolved Nov 2016. US stock indices reached record highs within weeks. Krugman retracted the call three days later. Effect on Paul Krugman&#39;s credibility: 57% → 44% (−13.0 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2016-11-08:allan-lichtman/2016-president</id>
<title>Allan Lichtman: partly on &quot;Donald Trump wins the 2016 presidential election&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/allan-lichtman#p-2016-president"/>
<updated>2016-11-08T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Partly. Donald Trump wins the 2016 presidential election. Made 23 Sep 2016, resolved 8 Nov 2016. Trump won the presidency but lost the popular vote, which Lichtman&#39;s own book said the keys predict. Effect on Allan Lichtman&#39;s credibility: 76% → 71% (−4.4 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2016-11-08:ann-selzer/2016-iowa-president</id>
<title>Ann Selzer: right on &quot;Donald Trump carries Iowa in 2016 (final Iowa Poll: Trump +7)&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/ann-selzer#p-2016-iowa-president"/>
<updated>2016-11-08T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. Donald Trump carries Iowa in 2016 (final Iowa Poll: Trump +7). Made 5 Nov 2016, resolved 8 Nov 2016. Trump won Iowa by 9.4 points. Effect on Ann Selzer&#39;s credibility: 71% → 77% (+6.6 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2016-11-08:nate-silver/2016-president</id>
<title>Nate Silver: wrong on &quot;Hillary Clinton wins the 2016 presidential election&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/nate-silver#p-2016-president"/>
<updated>2016-11-08T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. Hillary Clinton wins the 2016 presidential election. Made 8 Nov 2016, resolved 8 Nov 2016. Final FiveThirtyEight forecast gave Clinton a 71.4% chance, higher uncertainty than most other models. Effect on Nate Silver&#39;s credibility: 53% → 48% (−4.6 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2016-11-08:sam-wang/2016-president</id>
<title>Sam Wang: wrong on &quot;Hillary Clinton wins the 2016 presidential election&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/sam-wang#p-2016-president"/>
<updated>2016-11-08T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. Hillary Clinton wins the 2016 presidential election. Made 8 Nov 2016, resolved 8 Nov 2016. The consortium gave Clinton more than a 99% chance. Wang had promised to eat a bug if Trump won 240 electoral votes, and did so on CNN. Effect on Sam Wang&#39;s credibility: 62% → 49% (−12.8 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2016-07-19:nate-silver/2016-trump-nomination</id>
<title>Nate Silver: wrong on &quot;Donald Trump does not win the 2016 Republican nomination&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/nate-silver#p-2016-trump-nomination"/>
<updated>2016-07-19T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. Donald Trump does not win the 2016 Republican nomination. Made Aug 2015, resolved 19 Jul 2016. Silver put Trump&#39;s chances at about 2%, a judgement he later said was not model-based and called a mistake. Effect on Nate Silver&#39;s credibility: 68% → 53% (−15.2 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2015-12-15:paul-krugman/2009-deficits-rates</id>
<title>Paul Krugman: right on &quot;Large US budget deficits will not drive interest rates up while the economy stays depressed&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/paul-krugman#p-2009-deficits-rates"/>
<updated>2015-12-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. Large US budget deficits will not drive interest rates up while the economy stays depressed. Made 2009, resolved Dec 2015. The 10-year Treasury yield averaged under 3% in every year from 2011 to 2015. Effect on Paul Krugman&#39;s credibility: 40% → 57% (+17.1 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2014-11-04:ann-selzer/2014-iowa-senate</id>
<title>Ann Selzer: right on &quot;Joni Ernst wins the 2014 Iowa Senate race (final Iowa Poll: Ernst 51%, Braley 44%)&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/ann-selzer#p-2014-iowa-senate"/>
<updated>2014-11-04T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. Joni Ernst wins the 2014 Iowa Senate race (final Iowa Poll: Ernst 51%, Braley 44%). Made 1 Nov 2014, resolved 4 Nov 2014. Ernst won by 8.5 points. It was the only late poll close to the final margin. Effect on Ann Selzer&#39;s credibility: 62% → 72% (+10.5 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2013-11-30:csu-hurricane-forecast/2013-season</id>
<title>CSU hurricane forecast team: wrong on &quot;The 2013 Atlantic season will be active: 18 named storms, 9 hurricanes, 4 major (April outlook)&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/csu-hurricane-forecast#p-2013-season"/>
<updated>2013-11-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. The 2013 Atlantic season will be active: 18 named storms, 9 hurricanes, 4 major (April outlook). Made 10 Apr 2013, resolved 30 Nov 2013. 2013 had 14 named storms, 2 hurricanes and no major hurricanes. Effect on CSU hurricane forecast team&#39;s credibility: 61% → 44% (−17.1 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2012-11-06:allan-lichtman/2012-president</id>
<title>Allan Lichtman: right on &quot;Barack Obama wins re-election in 2012&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/allan-lichtman#p-2012-president"/>
<updated>2012-11-06T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. Barack Obama wins re-election in 2012. Made 2010, resolved 6 Nov 2012. Effect on Allan Lichtman&#39;s credibility: 74% → 79% (+4.6 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2012-11-06:nate-silver/2012-president</id>
<title>Nate Silver: right on &quot;Barack Obama wins re-election in 2012&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/nate-silver#p-2012-president"/>
<updated>2012-11-06T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. Barack Obama wins re-election in 2012. Made 6 Nov 2012, resolved 6 Nov 2012. Final forecast gave Obama a 90.9% chance and called all 50 states correctly. Effect on Nate Silver&#39;s credibility: 64% → 71% (+7.2 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2012-11-06:sam-wang/2012-president</id>
<title>Sam Wang: right on &quot;Barack Obama wins re-election in 2012&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/sam-wang#p-2012-president"/>
<updated>2012-11-06T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. Barack Obama wins re-election in 2012. Made Nov 2012, resolved 6 Nov 2012. Effect on Sam Wang&#39;s credibility: 53% → 64% (+10.9 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2010-09-23:jim-keyes/2008-netflix-radar</id>
<title>Jim Keyes: wrong on &quot;Neither Redbox nor Netflix is a serious competitive threat to Blockbuster&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/jim-keyes#p-2008-netflix-radar"/>
<updated>2010-09-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. Neither Redbox nor Netflix is a serious competitive threat to Blockbuster. Made Dec 2008, resolved 23 Sep 2010. Blockbuster filed for bankruptcy on 23 September 2010. Effect on Jim Keyes&#39;s credibility: 50% → 33% (−16.7 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2010-02-28:met-office/2009-mild-winter</id>
<title>Met Office: wrong on &quot;Winter 2009/10 is likely to be milder than the previous winter, with about a 1 in 7 chance of a cold one&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/met-office#p-2009-mild-winter"/>
<updated>2010-02-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. Winter 2009/10 is likely to be milder than the previous winter, with about a 1 in 7 chance of a cold one. Made 23 Jul 2009, resolved 28 Feb 2010. It was the UK&#39;s coldest winter since 1978/79, 2.0°C below the 1971-2000 average. Effect on Met Office&#39;s credibility: 34% → 29% (−5.0 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2009-08-31:met-office/2009-barbecue-summer</id>
<title>Met Office: wrong on &quot;Summer 2009 in the UK is odds-on to be a barbecue summer: warmer and drier than recent ones&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/met-office#p-2009-barbecue-summer"/>
<updated>2009-08-31T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. Summer 2009 in the UK is odds-on to be a barbecue summer: warmer and drier than recent ones. Made 30 Apr 2009, resolved 31 Aug 2009. July 2009 was one of the wettest on record in the UK. Effect on Met Office&#39;s credibility: 50% → 33% (−16.7 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2008-12-01:nouriel-roubini/2006-housing-crisis</id>
<title>Nouriel Roubini: right on &quot;The US faces a housing bust, a deep recession and a banking crisis&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/nouriel-roubini#p-2006-housing-crisis"/>
<updated>2008-12-01T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. The US faces a housing bust, a deep recession and a banking crisis. Made 7 Sep 2006, resolved 1 Dec 2008. Made in a speech at the IMF. The NBER later dated the recession from December 2007. Effect on Nouriel Roubini&#39;s credibility: 50% → 67% (+16.7 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2008-11-04:allan-lichtman/2008-president</id>
<title>Allan Lichtman: right on &quot;Barack Obama wins the 2008 presidential election&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/allan-lichtman#p-2008-president"/>
<updated>2008-11-04T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. Barack Obama wins the 2008 presidential election. Made 2008, resolved 4 Nov 2008. Effect on Allan Lichtman&#39;s credibility: 72% → 77% (+5.1 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2008-11-04:nate-silver/2008-president</id>
<title>Nate Silver: right on &quot;Barack Obama wins the 2008 presidential election&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/nate-silver#p-2008-president"/>
<updated>2008-11-04T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. Barack Obama wins the 2008 presidential election. Made 4 Nov 2008, resolved 4 Nov 2008. The final FiveThirtyEight map also called 49 of 50 states correctly, missing Indiana. Effect on Nate Silver&#39;s credibility: 50% → 67% (+16.7 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2008-11-04:sam-wang/2008-president</id>
<title>Sam Wang: right on &quot;Barack Obama wins the 2008 presidential election&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/sam-wang#p-2008-president"/>
<updated>2008-11-04T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. Barack Obama wins the 2008 presidential election. Made Nov 2008, resolved 4 Nov 2008. Effect on Sam Wang&#39;s credibility: 36% → 53% (+17.0 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2008-03-16:jim-cramer/2008-bear-stearns</id>
<title>Jim Cramer: wrong on &quot;Bear Stearns is fine; viewers should not move their money out of it&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/jim-cramer#p-2008-bear-stearns"/>
<updated>2008-03-16T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. Bear Stearns is fine; viewers should not move their money out of it. Made 11 Mar 2008, resolved 16 Mar 2008. Five days later Bear Stearns agreed to a rescue sale to JPMorgan at $2 a share. Effect on Jim Cramer&#39;s credibility: 38% → 28% (−10.5 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2008-01-03:ann-selzer/2008-iowa-caucus</id>
<title>Ann Selzer: right on &quot;Barack Obama wins the 2008 Iowa Democratic caucuses (final Iowa Poll: Obama 32%, Clinton 25%, Edwards 24%)&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/ann-selzer#p-2008-iowa-caucus"/>
<updated>2008-01-03T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. Barack Obama wins the 2008 Iowa Democratic caucuses (final Iowa Poll: Obama 32%, Clinton 25%, Edwards 24%). Made 1 Jan 2008, resolved 3 Jan 2008. Effect on Ann Selzer&#39;s credibility: 50% → 67% (+16.7 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2005-11-30:csu-hurricane-forecast/2005-season</id>
<title>CSU hurricane forecast team: right on &quot;The 2005 Atlantic hurricane season will be more active than average (April outlook)&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/csu-hurricane-forecast#p-2005-season"/>
<updated>2005-11-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. The 2005 Atlantic hurricane season will be more active than average (April outlook). Made Apr 2005, resolved 30 Nov 2005. 2005 produced 15 hurricanes, a record at the time, including Katrina. Effect on CSU hurricane forecast team&#39;s credibility: 50% → 67% (+16.7 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2005-07-01:paul-krugman/1998-internet-fax</id>
<title>Paul Krugman: wrong on &quot;By 2005 or so it will be clear that the internet&#39;s impact on the economy has been no greater than the fax machine&#39;s&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/paul-krugman#p-1998-internet-fax"/>
<updated>2005-07-01T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. By 2005 or so it will be clear that the internet&#39;s impact on the economy has been no greater than the fax machine&#39;s. Made Jun 1998, resolved 2005. Effect on Paul Krugman&#39;s credibility: 50% → 33% (−16.7 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2004-11-02:allan-lichtman/2004-president</id>
<title>Allan Lichtman: right on &quot;George W. Bush wins re-election in 2004&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/allan-lichtman#p-2004-president"/>
<updated>2004-11-02T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. George W. Bush wins re-election in 2004. Made 2004, resolved 2 Nov 2004. Effect on Allan Lichtman&#39;s credibility: 68% → 74% (+5.9 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2004-11-02:sam-wang/2004-president</id>
<title>Sam Wang: wrong on &quot;John Kerry wins the 2004 presidential election&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/sam-wang#p-2004-president"/>
<updated>2004-11-02T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. John Kerry wins the 2004 presidential election. Made Nov 2004, resolved 2 Nov 2004. His poll aggregate pointed to Bush; he overrode it with an assumption about undecided voters and later called that a humbling mistake. Effect on Sam Wang&#39;s credibility: 50% → 33% (−16.7 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2001-05-15:jim-cramer/2000-winners-new-world</id>
<title>Jim Cramer: wrong on &quot;Ten internet infrastructure stocks (Exodus, InfoSpace, Inktomi, VeriSign and six others) are the winners of the new world and worth owning&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/jim-cramer#p-2000-winners-new-world"/>
<updated>2001-05-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. Ten internet infrastructure stocks (Exodus, InfoSpace, Inktomi, VeriSign and six others) are the winners of the new world and worth owning. Made 29 Feb 2000, resolved May 2001. Fifteen months later Money magazine reported the list had fallen 82%. Effect on Jim Cramer&#39;s credibility: 50% → 33% (−16.7 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2000-12-12:allan-lichtman/2000-president</id>
<title>Allan Lichtman: partly on &quot;Al Gore wins the 2000 presidential election&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/allan-lichtman#p-2000-president"/>
<updated>2000-12-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Partly. Al Gore wins the 2000 presidential election. Made 2000, resolved 12 Dec 2000. Gore won the popular vote, which the keys then claimed to predict; George W. Bush won the presidency after Bush v. Gore. Effect on Allan Lichtman&#39;s credibility: 76% → 70% (−5.0 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,2000-01-01:paul-ehrlich/1971-england-2000</id>
<title>Paul Ehrlich: wrong on &quot;England will not exist in the year 2000 (offered at even money)&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/paul-ehrlich#p-1971-england-2000"/>
<updated>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. England will not exist in the year 2000 (offered at even money). Made 1971, resolved 1 Jan 2000. Effect on Paul Ehrlich&#39;s credibility: 36% → 40% (+3.7 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,1996-11-05:allan-lichtman/1996-president</id>
<title>Allan Lichtman: right on &quot;Bill Clinton wins re-election in 1996&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/allan-lichtman#p-1996-president"/>
<updated>1996-11-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. Bill Clinton wins re-election in 1996. Made 1996, resolved 5 Nov 1996. Effect on Allan Lichtman&#39;s credibility: 73% → 79% (+5.6 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,1992-11-03:allan-lichtman/1992-president</id>
<title>Allan Lichtman: right on &quot;Bill Clinton wins the 1992 presidential election&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/allan-lichtman#p-1992-president"/>
<updated>1992-11-03T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. Bill Clinton wins the 1992 presidential election. Made 1992, resolved 3 Nov 1992. Effect on Allan Lichtman&#39;s credibility: 70% → 77% (+6.9 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,1990-09-29:paul-ehrlich/1980-metals-wager</id>
<title>Paul Ehrlich: wrong on &quot;The prices of chromium, copper, nickel, tin and tungsten will rise between 1980 and 1990&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/paul-ehrlich#p-1980-metals-wager"/>
<updated>1990-09-29T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. The prices of chromium, copper, nickel, tin and tungsten will rise between 1980 and 1990. Made 29 Sep 1980, resolved 29 Sep 1990. All five fell in inflation-adjusted terms and Ehrlich paid Julian Simon on the wager. Effect on Paul Ehrlich&#39;s credibility: 40% → 29% (−11.6 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,1988-11-08:allan-lichtman/1988-president</id>
<title>Allan Lichtman: right on &quot;George H. W. Bush wins the 1988 presidential election&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/allan-lichtman#p-1988-president"/>
<updated>1988-11-08T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. George H. W. Bush wins the 1988 presidential election. Made 1988, resolved 8 Nov 1988. Effect on Allan Lichtman&#39;s credibility: 64% → 73% (+9.7 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,1987-10-16:michael-fish/1987-no-hurricane</id>
<title>Michael Fish: wrong on &quot;There is no hurricane on the way to the UK&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/michael-fish#p-1987-no-hurricane"/>
<updated>1987-10-16T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. There is no hurricane on the way to the UK. Made 15 Oct 1987, resolved 16 Oct 1987. Hours later the Great Storm of 1987 brought hurricane-force gusts to southern England. Fish has said the remark referred to a storm near Florida. Effect on Michael Fish&#39;s credibility: 50% → 33% (−16.7 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,1984-11-06:allan-lichtman/1984-president</id>
<title>Allan Lichtman: right on &quot;Ronald Reagan wins re-election in 1984&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/allan-lichtman#p-1984-president"/>
<updated>1984-11-06T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Right. Ronald Reagan wins re-election in 1984. Made 1982, resolved 6 Nov 1984. Effect on Allan Lichtman&#39;s credibility: 50% → 67% (+16.7 pts).</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>tag:alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev,1979-12-31:paul-ehrlich/1968-mass-starvation</id>
<title>Paul Ehrlich: wrong on &quot;In the 1970s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://alfheim-leader-credibility-decay-model.pages.dev/figures/paul-ehrlich#p-1968-mass-starvation"/>
<updated>1979-12-31T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Prediction Track Record</name></author>
<summary>Wrong. In the 1970s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death. Made 1968, resolved 31 Dec 1979. Famines occurred, but nothing on that scale; food output grew faster than population through the Green Revolution. Effect on Paul Ehrlich&#39;s credibility: 50% → 33% (−16.7 pts).</summary>
</entry>
</feed>
